Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christopher Dougherty's avatar

I'm not an auntie, but I am an uncle to my sister's three teenagers and have a kid of my own now, so I'm really enjoying your newsletter and wish that I had seen more advice like this when those teenagers were toddlers.

You had asked for feedback on Charity Navigator from people who know things about charity rating systems. The short answer is that Charity Navigator, and other similar systems, are flawed because they only look at very narrow measurements of very few things and they don't consider the context or the needs of the specific community that any given charity works in. There's a good explanation of the issues here: https://www.philanthropy.com/article/charity-navigators-ratings-are-inherently-flawed-heres-a-simple-solution

The other thing that I need to point out is that the emphasis on low overhead in charities is at odds with what you write about "trading, sharing, collaborating, paying attention to each other, and enjoying one another’s company, which are among the most important life skills we’re going to need for the messed-up future we’re facing".

Charity overheads are mostly three things: 1) stuff that charities need to spend money on to prove that they are complying with laws or expectations (like audits, program evaluations, impact reports, and providing information to Charity Navigator and funders), 2) stuff that is absolutely necessary to help people like computers, electricity, and working toilets, and 3) people. The people who work in nonprofits and who provide programs, and who do the work of raising money to pay for those programs, and who make sure that 1 and 2 above happen are all overhead. Charities that report no or low overhead are either entirely volunteer-run (cool! but these are tiny charities that aren't usually showing up on lists like Charity Navigator) or are using accounting rules to hide overhead costs (like allocating a janitor's wages to a program or like having a separate donor pay for all overhead costs). People who depend on charities deserve services that are safe, clean, and well-run, and people who work in charities deserve to be paid reasonably for their labour.

The best way to pick a charity to donate to is to pick a cause that is important to you and give to a charity working on that cause that is local and known to you or those you trust.

Or, if you want to give directly to someone who needs help without any of the money being used for audits, or plumbing, or paying wages, then mutual aid organizations are the way to go.

Expand full comment
Kia's avatar

I love a white elephant! My family has been doing it for years. We recently added a fun variation that really ups the play and interaction - I’ll share it here in case anyone feels white elephant needs more competitive action (lol)

If your gift is being “stolen” you (the stealee”) have the option of challenging the stealer to retain your gift. In this case, the stealee can either propose a card draw between stealer and “stealee” (highest card wins) or come up with their own custom challenge usually with the rest of the family being the judge. Whoever wins gets the gift and the game goes on. This has resulted in some truly creative and hilarious dance offs; breath holding; and joke telling contests in my family!

Expand full comment
26 more comments...

No posts